Tuesday 31 October 2017

#36 A previously banned book




The Catcher in the Rye  - J.D. Salinger 


Since its publication in 1951,  The Catcher in the Rye  has probably has had the most fascinating distinction of being the most banned, censored and challenged books, as well as being the second most taught book in American high-schools. 

It tells the story from the first-person point of view of the 16 year-old anti-hero Holden Caulfield as he embarks on a journey towards a complete nervous breakdown. To begin with he is from a well to do, upper class, white American family and he has failed four of his five papers at his most latest school – Pencey Prep. He is about to be sent home from school , but he decides to take matters into his own hands and runs away from there to spend a few days in a hotel  since in his own words he needed “a little vacation”.  The frustrations and ennui of teenage life mirrored in Holden’s narrative of what happens in the weekend he spends in Manhattan has made this book a haunting voice of the angst driven adolescent across the years.

It probably has one of the most memorable opening lines which are oft quoted:

“If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you’ll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my parents were occupied and all before they had me, and all the David Copperfield kind of crap, but I don’t feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth.”

There is from the very beginning an unrestrained use of many words which were seen as excessively vulgar (especially in the 60s and 70s), and Holden is relentless in bringing to light what he exactly thinks of the “phony” society around him. This was one reason for the controversies that surrounded this book. Also, the fact that he smokes a lot, has complete disregard for rules, and is a truly fantastic liar. The reader begins to realize pretty soon that Holden is on a downward spiral towards depression and a subsequent breakdown. He contemplates running away from home and even mentions suicide a couple of times.

These references to extreme depression, suicide and his anti-authoritarian stance has come together to create a halo of controversies that surrounds this book. Its persecutors believe that this book has inspired murders, suicides, and moral profanity and clamours for it to be banned. The association of The Catcher in the Rye with the murder of John Lennon by Mark Chapman and John Hinckley’s failed assassination of Ronald Reagan didn’t help it either (when the police arrived at the scene of John Lennon's murder, they found 25-year-old Mark David Chapman reading aloud from The Catcher in the Rye. He'd bought a copy of the book—his favourite—en route to murder John Lennon; in it he wrote "This is my statement," and signed as Holden Caulfield. The next year, police found a copy of The Catcher in the Rye at the home of John Hinckley Jr. after he attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan).

Moreover, there is nothing much happening in the book, one pathetic incident after another (for eg: a night out in a fancy hotel; a date with an old girlfriend; an encounter with a prostitute, and a mugging by her pimp). It was a subversive and unconventional story in more ways than one. However, with the benefit of distance from its year of publication, one can see how banning a book on teenage rebellion is only going to make rebellious teenagers seek it out even more. And that is exactly what happened I suppose.   

However, I must tell you, Holden is extremely deceptive. There is another person altogether if you can look through the subtext. He is probably one of the most well-read protagonist I have come across. He refers to a lot of books he has read including Romeo and Juliet , Thomas Hardy and Somerset Maugham. In fact the only exam he doesn’t flunk is English.

“They gave me Out of Africa, by Isak Dinesen. I thought it was going to stink, but it didn’t. It was a very good book. I’m quite illiterate, but I read a lot.”

One thing that will probably bothers us as we read is his self-confession that he is “the most terrific liar you ever saw in your life”(Ch 3). And there begins a sense of unreliability in his narration. Then again, we are inside the head of a troubled teenager, and I fully admired how the author unravels his rambling state of mind for us. His sarcasm and witty liners are crazy and funny at the same time.

He shoved my book back with his hand so that he could see the name of it. ‘Any good?’ he said.
‘This sentence I’m reading is terrific.’

Holden is tortured by the battle to come to terms with himself, with his little sister Phoebe, and their dead brother Allie. Like many adolescents, he feels that the world is an alien, hostile and comfortless place run by “phonies”. When asked what he intends to be when he grows up by his kid sister Phoebe, he replies he wants to be a “catcher in the rye”, which is a reference to a song by Robert Burns where a person catches the children playing in a field of rye before they fall off the cliff. It has a symbolic meaning which points to him trying to save other kids from losing their innocence and ‘saving’ them from adult life. Hence the title.

Despite the many controversies, The Catcher in the Rye continues to hold its place as the defining novel of teenage angst and alienation. It is also has avoided being turned into a movie these past 66 years, and it will probably continue to remain so since the highly secretive author J.D. Salinger refused to sell the movie rights. Well, Holden Caufield would have approved – “I hate the movies like poison, but I get a bang imitating them…All I need is an audience. I’m an exhibitionist.”  Well, needless to say, he will definitely be assured of an audience for a long time to come.


Saturday 28 October 2017

#35 A book translated from another language


Britt-Marie Was Here  - Fredrik Backman


Britt-Marie is 63, and when first meet her, she is trying to get a job because she is afraid no one will notice if she were to die – one can immediately feel her isolation and loneliness. But the author is Fredrik Backman ( whose A Man Called Ove  was lovingly reviewed by me a few months earlier) , and his trademark dark humour penetrates this tale too as we begin on a whole new leg of life with Britt-Marie.

His characters are all lonely, eccentric, and meticulous in their fixed routines of everyday life. Justs like Ove, I found Britt-Marie to be a quirky but extremely lovable character.

“Some people don’t understand the value of lists, but Britt-Marie is not one of those people. She has so many lists that she has to keep a separate list to list all the lists.”

Having lived the past forty years of her life looking after the house, and an ungrateful husband, she is now at liberty to do what she wants. But at her age, with absolutely no qualification or experience what can be expected?

With a little help, Britt-Marie lands up in a town called Borg, where everything is being closed down – a place in the middle of nowhere. However, within a few pages we will meet one of the greatest set of oddball characters who all have a story to tell, who all come together in some way or the other to bring meaning and purpose in Britt-Marie’s life.  

If there is one thing that dominates the lives of the people of Borg , that would have to be football. And before she knows, Britt-Marie, who had hitherto absolutely no interest in football becomes the football coach to the children’s team. Well…no matter how much you think your life is going to turn out, it will have a lot of surprises for you, that’s for sure. For football aficionados there are these wonderful titbits on certain football teams and also this marvelous and insightful quote:

“You love football because its instinctive. If a ball comes rolling down the street you give it a punt. You love it for the same reason you fall in love. Because you don’t know how to avoid it.”

You will be in love with Britt-Marie for the same reason too. You can’t avoid it. :)


Wednesday 25 October 2017

#34 A book about science


The Magic of Reality  - Richard Dawkins 



Richard Dawkins, who was the University of Oxford's Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995 until 2008, provides us with a sweeping introduction to science in this slim volume. It is a very basic introduction to science and most of us would probably know all that he has to say – but the newness lies in HOW he chooses to bring this about. 

Each chapter is preceded by a question which he goes on to answer using various examples, illustrations and myths. That’s right – MYTHS. In fact he begins with several myths that explain the chosen phenomenon (eg: rainbows) and then goes on to provide a scientific explanation to it instead.

In his opening chapter he clearly lays out his intentions – to justify the real world through science and dispel myths for young readers. The illustrations accompanying the text are beautifully rendered by Dave Mckean (however, it is not available in the simpler paperback version). The language is very simple, almost feels like the author is giving his voice to a documentary and explaining the mysteries of the world to you.

  Some of the questions include:
-          Who was the first person?
-          Why are there so many different animals?
-          What are things made up of?
-          What is the sun? etc….

As is probably clear from the questions themselves, this covers a lot of scientific ground including aspects of physics, chemistry and biology. The practical examples and ‘thought’ experiments he urges us to try are effective and helps us in quickly understanding the point he is trying to explain.
It would be a good read for youngsters as a general introduction to science and scientific thought. The use of myths was fascinating to me as they were diverse stories from many different cultures and it added a touch of magic to the whole thing. But what does he mean by the ‘magic of reality’? It is hardly a phrase we would hear, almost paradoxical in fact. Richard Dawkins gives the most sincere and endearing explanation for this:

Illustrations (not in the Paperback) are wonderfully rendered by Dave Mckean 
“The truth is more magical – in the best and most exciting sense of the word – than any myth or made up mystery or miracle. Science has its own magic: the magic of reality.”

He terms this kind of magic as ‘poetic’ magic – something which creates wonder and joy in one’s soul. Science in its noblest pursuits does indeed produce magic, I agree.

It is a light read for most of us, and will leave us recalling our high school science and a bit more. It isn’t too heavy on scientific terminology and therefore is very readable. However, one point is to be noted – the author does question certain cultural myths and religious facts. Apparently he is famous for religion-bashing, but I realize that as a scientist he does what he knows best and explains the world in the most rational and scientific way. So, in case that is a sore point I would advise one to take the book with a pinch of salt.

Tuesday 24 October 2017

#33 A book you can finish in a day



 

The Upside of Unrequited  - Becky Albertalli


Becky Albertalli became hugely popular after the publication of her debut fiction - first book Simon Vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda (havn't read it yet). This is her highly anticipated second novel. It doesn’t disappoint! It is a light, refreshing and diverse read.

The story centers around Molly Peskin-Suso , a 17 year old who has had 26 crushes so far but no first kiss or a boyfriend. So she knows a lot about unrequited love. However, things start changing with two boys coming into the picture – the awkward Tolkien fan Reid and the incredibly good-looking Will who both seem to be the perfect love interest for Molly. It may seem like a typical teenage romance – it is …. in a way – but there were a lot of refreshing differences.

First of all this book has a LOT of diversity - skin colour, sexuality, gender identity, religion, body size, mental health – it’s all there. Molly and her twin Cassie have two moms – Patty and Nadine. They have a baby brother Xavier. Cassie has a girlfriend Mina (who is a Korean American) , Molly is of the Jewish faith but isn’t religious, she is on medication for panic attacks – I suppose you get the picture. It was interesting to read a very honest and heartfelt tale of so many concerns albeit in a light-hearted manner.

There are many winning attributes to this book. Beginning with the protagonist Molly, who is very likeable, and the fact that many of anxieties and concern seems exactly what a teenager might go through. He anxiety about her looks and her social awkwardness however doesn’t cover up the fact that she is really smart and creative, and extremely nice.

Another great thing about the book was how it deals with the relationship between the sisters Molly and Cassie. When Cassie starts getting involved with Mina, Molly feels left out. Her coming to terms with how they drift apart is sad and heart-felt but at the same time is beautifully explained. The pains of growing up, of  having different interests, of coming to accept who you are, being comfortable in your own skin – all these are deftly dealt with. There were also a lot of lines which were insightful and funny at the same time.

“Perfect! You guys are the same age. I bet you have a lot in common.”
Classic adult logic. Reid and I are vaguely the same age, so of course we’re basically soul mates. It’s like horoscopes. Somehow I’m supposed to believe that I’m similar in some meaningful way to every single person born on my birthday. Or every single Sagittarius. I mean, I barely have anything in common with Cassie, and we were born six minutes apart.”

It is a reflection of the times that it has a lot of SMS communications , Skype chats, discussion of popular songs and even few swear words thrown in for good measure. It is a light-hearted read, and if we ask too many questions it may fall apart (so I am not going to!) but, it is definitely readable.

   

Monday 23 October 2017

#32 A book about psychology

   

Proust Was A Neuroscientist  - Jonah Lehrer


This book has a fascinating title, a promising start but sadly, it was a disappointment by the end.
The author who has had some experience working in neuroscience laboratories and that too under some of the best minds in the field, sets out to explain in this book how select artists, writers, musicians and painters, anticipated many discoveries of our brain functioning through their work. It was an extremely interesting premise to begin with. It has always been a fascinating juxtaposition - art & science.

In each chapter, the author, explains a bit of the background of the artist under study and connects their work to some aspect of neuroscience. For instance, he begins with how Walt Whitman had predicted, in fact, been absolutely sure that emotions are generated by the body -  a discovery made much later by neuroscientists.

“In fact, it was not until 1875, twenty years after Whitman first sang of electric bodies (in I Sing the Body Electric that it was discovered that he was right, the nervous system actually conveys electric current.”

Similarly, startling assertions are made about a variety of famous people of the 19th and 20th c including George Eliot, Marcel Proust, Paul Cezanne (painter), Gertrude Stein, Virginia Woolf etc. To each personality he has assigned a particular concept of neuroscience like language, memory, sight, taste etc. Though a lot of their work itself is used to explain the connections he is making, it felt a bit too tedious and if I may say so, too repetitive, to  be fully enjoyable.

Admittedly there were a few parts I did enjoy – my favourite was about the artist Paul Cezanne who I had only vaguely heard of before. Reading his analysis of Cezanne’s ground-breaking technique of post-impressionistic art was highly fascinating. His art apparently wasn’t showing us what he saw (as the impressionists did) but rather as how we saw it. It intrigued me to read up more about Cezanne and have since found a new found appreciation for his art.

I am no scientist, but I strongly felt he was getting his science wrong or citing it imprecisely for a certain dramatic effect. His literary interpretations didn’t make much impression on me either, probably because I have read these works being analyzed before. In fact, his chapter on George Eliot, the way he was trying to connect her philosophy of writing to the “freedom of biology” was quite far-fetched, and not at all convincing.

The chapters on Whitman and Woolf were definitely better written. Essentially the author is persuading us to consider and put into practice a ‘fourth culture’, in which science can enlighten art and art can enlighten science. However, by equating the prolific and incessant writer Marcel Proust to a neuroscientist (which requires years of practice, precise calculations, and incessant understanding of the human mind)   makes Lehrer guilty of the very ‘reductionism’ of science which he is appealing against.